Health Care? Whose?

Date: Monday, March 22, 2010, 1:13 AM It's not just the abortions, it is the danger to the elderly and the chronically ill also.  It is the government's meddling in our choice of healthcare.  It is the so-called government subsidy of enforced insurance.  It is then, these virtual government insurance companies' telling doctors and patients what treatments and medical supplies they will and will not pay for.  They will pay for abortions, and they will pay for withholding of treatment of the elderly and - mark my words - they will pay to actively shorten lives.   Oh, you may die sooner waiting for red tape to untangle, while you fill out endless forms, and wait in crowded doctor's offices..  Except for members of congress, of course. We just lost another bit of freedom.   Dee  ORGANIC and Inexpensive: http://beefandturkeyjerky.blogspot.com/2006/07/guess-what.html From: LifeSiteNews.com <lsn@lifesitenewsemail.com> Date: Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:31 AM Subject: LifeSiteNews.com - Sunday March 21, 2010 The Obama administration has won its victory, for now, on the health care battle. In the end, when it mattered the most, the pro-life Democrats betrayed all Americans who had trusted them to stay the course on principles. They did not stay that course and sold out for what are highly likely to be worthless promises. The Catholic Church leadership must now realize, more than ever before, that it has a huge problem with various Catholic organizations and leaders having played a crucial role in bringing about this massive expansion of anti-life government power. Much sober reflection is required about what allowed the situation to develop where Church authority was so totally and very publicly rejected. The first Sunday report was written late that night. The second was published much earlier on Sunday as developments were still under way. Yesterday, our US readers were sent a report on the death of Fr. Paul Marx (http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/mar/10032002.html). Unfortunately, there was a serious one word typo in a quote from Fr. Euteneur regarding Fr. Marx. The sentence in question should have read, "We miss him terribly but we pray that he has entered into the fullness of life for which he worked so hard in this world." Our apologies for the error. Steve Jalsevac LifeSiteNews.com LifeSiteNews.com - Sunday March 21, 2010 * Health Care Bill Passes Congress after Last-Minute Stupak Flip-Flop * Breaking: Stupak Says 'Close' to Deal with WH on Abortion Executive Order Please DO NOT REPLY to this message. Replies will not be seen. Contact us here. Donate | Subscribe to Daily News | Unsubscribe | Change E-Mail Address | Subscribe Friends | News Tips | Search LifeSiteNews.com Health Care Bill Passes Congress after Last-Minute Stupak Flip-Flop By John Jalsevac WASHINGTON, D.C., March 21, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) – On Sunday evening the U.S. Congress voted to approve the Democrats' pro-abortion health care reform bill in a 219-212 vote. The bill edged through the House after Rep. Bart Stupak announced earlier this afternoon that he and his fellow group of Democrats who had been holding out for language banning abortion funding, had struck a deal with the White House. That deal involved the promise of an executive order from Obama that Stupak said would uphold the Hyde amendment in health care reform, and prevent abortion funding. The group of Democrats led by Stupak then promised to throw their weight behind the bill, pushing it past the 216 vote threshold that it needed to become law. The executive order deal, however, has been unanimously condemned by pro-life advocates, including the National Right to Life Committee and the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, as woefully inadequate. NRLC released a statement Sunday afternoon, following Stupak's shock announcement that he would vote for the bill, in which they said, "The executive order promised by President Obama was issued for political effect.  It changes nothing.  It does not correct any of the serious pro-abortion provisions in the bill.  The president cannot amend a bill by issuing an order, and the federal courts will enforce what the law says." The USCCB agreed with the assessment of NRLC, pointing out that "only a change in the law enacted by Congress, not an executive order, can begin to address this very serious problem (abortion funding) in the legislation." Marjorie Dannenfelser, the President of the Susan B. Anthony List, announced this evening that her organization would be stripping Rep. Stupak of the "Defender of Life" award, which they had intended to present him with this coming Wednesday at their annual gala. "Let me be clear," she said, "any representative, including Rep. Stupak, who votes for this healthcare bill can no longer call themselves 'pro-life.'" Dannenfelser pointed out, as evidence of the executive order's inadequacy for protecting life, the fact that pro-abortion lawmakers have welcomed the order. On Saturday night, pro-abortion Rep. DeGette told The Huffington Post, "If there was an executive order saying they weren't going to use federal funds in the bill to pay for abortions that would be fine with me." On Sunday, Rep. Wasserman Schultz admitted to Fox News' Megyn Kelly that "an executive order cannot change the law." Planned Parenthood condemned the president's executive order, but also said that they were "grateful" that the order was not equivalent to Stupak's original language. "So while we regret that this proposed Executive Order has given the imprimatur of the president to Senator Nelson's language, we are grateful that it does not include the Stupak abortion ban," said the Planned Parenthood statement. Tony Perkins, President of the Family Research Council, expressed his disappointment with the outcome of the vote late Sunday evening, and lambasted Stupak and his fellow pro-life Democrats, for their last-minute about-face. "Some Democratic Members who have had good pro-life records in the past turned away from those principles today, instead putting their trust in the most pro-abortion President in history and his equally pro-abortion Health and Human Services Secretary, Kathleen Sebelius," said Perkins. "The President knows his promise would not have the weight of statutory law and is not worth the paper it was printed on. Any order from the President will likely quickly fall in the U.S. courts, if not reversed by Barack Obama himself.   "The President's disregard for the unborn is no surprise. It is the betrayal from those who have fought for life within his party that is the biggest shock. Especially Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) who had fought so valiantly in this debate, but folded when it really mattered." "We are not fooled," said Concerned Women for America (CWA) CEO Penny Nance. "This is the biggest expansion of abortion funding since Roe v. Wade. And a flimsy promise of an executive order from the President may make it more comfortable for 'pro-life' Democrats like Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Michigan) to vote for the bill, but in the end, such an illusory promise is not even worth the paper on which it's written. Backroom deals and compromises will not soften the blow of this attack on life and liberty as we know and enjoy it. Americans will not forget those Members of Congress who refused to listen to them. They will make their voices heard in November." Developing… Back to Top | Print this Story | Email to a Friend | View Story on LifeSiteNews.com Breaking: Stupak Says 'Close' to Deal with WH on Abortion Executive Order Bishops' Final Plea: Kill Abortion-Laden Senate Health Bill By Kathleen Gilbert WASHINGTON, DC, March 20, 2010 (LifeSiteNews.com) -  Only one day after sources confirmed that the leader of the pro-life House Democrats was "finished with Pelosi" and her bid for their votes on the Senate health care bill, Rep. Bart Stupak (D-Mich.) told MSNBC Sunday morning that he and the White House are "close to getting something done" regarding an abortion funding ban via executive order. The Michigan Democrat said he had been engaged in negotiations late into Saturday night. "We're close but we're not there yet," he said. Stupak acknowledged what several pundits have already deduced regarding Pelosi's quest for the 216 votes needed for passage - that unless some of Stupak's group of pro-life Democrats are won over to the bill, leadership simply doesn't have the votes. The bill is estimated to go up for a final vote in the House at about 6:15 pm EST on Sunday, with a vote on the reconciliation package at about 6 pm. According to the Hill, Stupak had said the day before the vote that there were "at least six" of his original dozen that were holding firm in opposing the health bill, and that he was "going to think about" what form an executive order regarding abortion funding would need to take for him to be satisfied. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), one of Stupak's group, had told the paper that an executive order "could be helpful, depending on what's in it," but as she hadn't talked to the White House about it, "I don't really know how real that is." According to the Washington Post Sunday morning - which counted the remaining pro-life Democrats at 10 - Kaptur expressed doubt that the order could bring the entire group of pro-life Democrats around. Noting that pro-abortion Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO) signed off on the executive order idea, Kathryn Jean Lopez of the National Review Online called the endorsement "an iron-clad guarantee it's no real alternative for any member who calls himself 'pro-life.'" Despite news of the executive order pitch, the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops in a final communique to the House of Representatives insisted that "the Senate legislation now presented to the House of Representatives on a 'take it or leave it' basis sadly fails this test and ought to be opposed." In a breakdown of the final day's whip count, Politico's Josh Kraushaar pegged the most critical votes as coming from Reps. Baird, Berry, Tanner, Kaptur, Dahlkemper, Driehaus and Kissell. See related LifeSiteNews.com coverage: Breakdown: Pelosi's 11th-Hour Pitch for Pro-Life Dem Votes Crumbles http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2010/mar/10032001.html Back to Top | Print this Story | Email to a Friend | View Story on LifeSiteNews.com Donate | Subscribe to Daily News | Unsubscribe | Change E-Mail Address | Subscribe Friends | News Tips | Contact Us | Search LifeSiteNews.com Copyright © LifeSiteNews.com. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives License. You may republish this article or portions of it without request provided the content is not altered and it is clearly attributed to "LifeSiteNews.com". Any website publishing of complete or large portions of original LifeSiteNews articles MUST additionally include a live link to www.LifeSiteNews.com. The link is not required for excerpts. Republishing of articles on LifeSiteNews.com from other sources as noted is subject to the conditions of those sources.